The latest Texas Textbook Controversy has had me thinking a lot about education. I say the “latest,” because there’s always a Texas Textbook Controversy. Texas, being the largest buyer of school textbooks, has the largest voice in what goes into the books, and how it’s presented. Call it right, call it wrong, it happens, and the side opposed to the changes always starts calling doomsday.

Toward the end of the above-cited article, someone opposed to the changes leveled the criticism that education will be “dumbed down,” as children will have to memorize large lists of names and dates, rather than think critically about subject matter. The truth is, that the most extensive “dumbing down” of American education came in the 1970s, through different attempts to liberalize education. It’s been argued that this dumbing down was a widespread conspiracy, but I’ve taught in public schools, and, quite frankly, the “American Education System” is neither organized nor monolithic enough to support any sort of conspiracy, conservative or liberal. There is no national education system, although there should be. Rather, public education is centralized only at the state level, and most decisions transpire at the district and school level. And, like any bureaucracy, the cogs and gears turn not at the whim of some cadre of puppet-masters, but as a result of the sometimes competing, sometimes complementary interests of the individuals who make it up.

The last Great Dumbing Down wasn’t a conspiracy to make Americans intellectually weaker, though that’s what happened. In an attempt to make education more interesting and engaging to students (an admirable goal), memorization, critical thinking, and core skills (“the three r’s”) were de-emphasized, and entertainment value became a factor. Along with these changes, the societal changes of a rejection of authority (not always a bad thing, but not always a good thing), and the rise of TV contributed to the idea that teachers need to be entertainers, and schools “fun” more than anything else. Add experimental movements like “new math” and “inventive spelling,” and it’s not hard to see why American education is in the state it’s in.

There has been an attempt to bring critical thinking into the curriculum, and I applaud this. However, critical thinking is difficult to pull off if students have not memorized the basics. One can’t run before one has crawled. One cannot (or perhaps should not) write an essay in favor of or against U.S. participation in the United Nations, if one does not know when, how, and why the U.N. was formed. And one doesn’t divine these facts by relying on “intuition” or “feelings.” It’s great to know that multiplication is commutative, but if you can’t balance your checkbook, figure out what 30% off of a discounted item would be, or figure out which box of cereal is best value for money, what’s the fucking point? Memorization is not evil. Memorization is one of the pillars of intellectual rigor.

This is not to say that memorization is the only thing students should be doing. But to decry curriculum change based on the idea that it will require memorization from children being brought up in a culture of forgetfulness and gnat-like attention spans is silly at best. If anything, we need more memorization and a return to the basics, so that the higher goals of liberalization can be achieved.

(to be continued)

6 thoughts on “Education and Persuasion, pt. 1

  1. I still can’t believe how rarely grammar is taught in schools, not only because I actually liked diagramming sentences. How can you communicate if you can’t write? And how can you write if you don’t know how to construct a basic sentence?

  2. Why is Texas the largest buyer of school textbooks, anyway? I thought California was the most populous state, followed by New York. Or is that just with regard to registered voters?

    I’m with Shani; bring back spelling, grammar, and composition along with current events and critical thinking. Critical thinking is only half a skill if it’s not accompanied by the ability to communicate effectively. By which I mean, without the use of the word “like” except in a simile.

    1. I love the new layout. The eye came from a google search on images for “mechanical eye.” I tried desperately to find out who made it to credit them, but couldn’t find the name of the artist. If anyone finds it, I’ll be happy to credit.

      It’s almost painful to hear stories from my friends teaching university right now–so many students are ill-equipped for higher education (and these are the cream of the crop!), and when they do get there, they seem to regard it as some kind of dodge, and spend more much time figuring out ways of getting around the work (and calling in special favors and making up sob stories when their schemes fall flat) than they would have actually educating themselves. I’m glad I’m not teaching today.

  3. Per the NYT, Texas is ONE OF the largest buyers of textbooks, not THE largest. But they are the ones trying to tilt the curriculum to the right.

    If the rest of us band together, surely we can obtain fact-based textbooks (rather than faith-based)?

    1. Gosh, that would be nice, but does either side know what a fact is anymore? Both sides seem eager to rewrite history to better fit with their current political agendas, and to replace fact with either conservative religious faith, or the Faith Of Intuition and Feelings. And we’re all the worse for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s